Thanks to the Malaysian government hosting the three-day 16th International Anti-Corruption Conference (IACC) in Putrajaya from Sept. 2 – 4, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s RM2.6 billion “donation” scandal has been transformed from a national scandal into a global one.
Henceforth, through the 1,000 delegates representing the foremost anti-graft fighters from 130 countries who attended the 16th IAAC, the world will be following closely the development of Najib’s RM2.6 billion “donation” scandal – to determine whether it will be a classic case of the theme of the 16th IACC, “Ending Impunity: People. Integrity. Action” in the most negative sense!
This year of 2015 should the best possible year for Malaysia in terms of international publicity, as Malaysia is the chair of ASEAN and a member of the UN Security Council, but it is shaping up to be Malaysia’s worst and most horrible international year in the nation’s history – really annus horribilis for Malaysia!
For three days, through the 16th IACC, Malaysia was not only lectured by Europeans, Australians and Americans, but also by Africans and South Americans such as by countries like Peru, Cameroon and Russia, about the deplorable state of integrity and ant-corruption in Malaysia.
Now the whole world knows that the Malaysian Prime Minister could not answer simple questions, to the extent that he had to pull out from the official ceremony of the 16th IACC, which is probably the first time where the head of government of a host country had to run away from an international conference!
As the Transparency International chair Jose Ugaz said at the opening of the IACC, “there are two questions that need to be answered, who paid the money and why, and where did it go?”
Or as the TI co-founder and former adviser to Najib and the Malaysian government on anti-corruption matters, Michael J. Hershman said on the second day, “Tell the truth about where did the money come from and address the accusation. And if he did something wrong, then asked for forgiveness and face the consequences.”
And more pointedly, Hershman said: “If it came from the Middle East, who did it come from? When did it come and for what purpose? These are very simple questions.”
Hershman said since Najib had control of the account, he must know where it came from, adding: “There is no reason for a panel for investigations. Just tell the truth. Get it out in the public.”
RM2.6 billion is not a puny sum. It is in fact 26 times more than what is permissible to be spent by all the 222 Parliamentary candidates and 505 State Assembly candidates of the Barisan Nasional in the 13th General Elections.
The maximum expenditure which is legally permissible for a parliamentary candidate is RM200,000 while the maximum legal expenditure for a State Assembly candidate is RM100,000.
With 222 Parliamentary candidates and 505 State Assembly candidates, the maximum legal electoral expenditures for all the 222 Parliamentary and 505 State Assembly candidates of UMNO/Barisan Nasional in the 13th General Election will come to RM44.4 million for all parliamentary candidates and RM50.5 million for all state assembly candidates or a grand total of RM94.9 million – not even reaching RM100 million!
The RM2.6 billion in Najib’s personal accounts for the 13th General Election is therefore more than 26 times the legally permissible limit to be spent by all the BN parliamentary and state assembly candidates in the 13th General Elections.
Najib will have to explain this great disparity if he believes in accountability, transparency, integrity and good governance.
Tonight, I want to ask two more questions to Najib about the RM2.6 billion “donation” scandal:
1. What are the total donations in his personal accounts for the 13th General Elections – as it is most unlikely that they were just RM2.6 billion which was exposed by the Wall Street Journal in its report of July 3, 2015; and if so, Najib should reveal what were the total donations in his personal accounts for the 13th general elections – whether they were just RM2.6 billion or many times more, and if so, the actual figures.
2. How many foreign donors and the total sum of donation from foreign sources for the UMNO/Barisan Nasional campaign in the 13th General Elections, and whether he agrees that this is most questionable as it undermines the independence and sovereignty of Malaysia and that no political party should receive a single sen of foreign donation for general election purpose.
Najib should answer the two earlier and now the two additional questions on the RM2.6 billion “donation” scandal as he cannot keep running and trying to hide away from these probing questions.
(Speech at the DAP Kota Tinggi DAP Branch solidarity dinner in Kota Tinggi on Sunday, Sept. 6, 2015 at 10 pm)
A friend from overseas unfamiliar with Malaysian politics asked me about the whole scandal of 1MDB and the RM2.6b “donation”. After explaining it to him, he asked Is your PM King? I REPLIED NO BUT UMNO IS KING..
I then realized that is what Malaysia has turned out to be, from a monarchy system of a group of kingdoms, we have become a country ruled by a political party that is KING – rule, laws, institutions means nothing, their words is law. The different personalities and leaders just represents the different part of King-rule – its pretty crazy king in fact, suspicious, insecure, scheming, self-absorbed, malicious when threatened or ambitious, but also at one time, benign and generous to a fault, etc.
If you think about it, if a person has such characteristic, he would be described as ANTI-SOCIAL..And that is the truth about UMNO – its an anti-social political party..
A friend from overseas unfamiliar with Malaysian politics asked me about the whole scandal of 1MDB and the RM2.6b “donation”. After explaining it to him, he asked Is your PM King? I REPLIED NO BUT UMNO IS KING..
I then realized that is what Malaysia has turned out to be, from a monarchy system of a group of kingdoms, we have become a country ruled by a political party that is KING – rule, laws, institutions means nothing, their words is law. The different personalities and leaders just represents the different part of King-rule – its pretty crazy king in fact, suspicious, insecure, scheming, self-absorbed, malicious when threatened or ambitious, but also at one time, benign and generous to a fault, etc.
If you think about it, if a person has such characteristic, he would be described as ANTI-SOCIAL..And that is the truth about UMNO – its an anti-social pathological political party..
Strong declaration
http://16iacc.org/blog/2015/09/04/putrajaya-declaration
Good and clear.
Given that the DPM cum 2nd man in UMNO was not even awared that there exist “donation” in Najib’s personal bank account, what if Najib suddenly passes away? What will happen to the billions?
I say man, the 2.6 billion (a billion is a thousand million) was meant to fight the Islamic State and I suppose it was spent for that purpose by the Prime Minister. We have to take it as gospel truth since our beloved Prime Minister says or hints that the donation was used to fight the Islamic State. I suppose the PM is going to account for every sen of the donation. The bad one in all this is that Sarawak newswoman who spoiled everything. I hear from the NST that she is waiting to ‘drink’ when the king is finally dethroned (because she poked fire about him).