by Duwen Babat
My focus on electoral reform with reference to Sarawak are in four areas that are as follow.
1. Development during campaigning period – I would suggest that all development must be stopped when the DUN/Parliament is dissolved. The caretaker government must not be allowed to used development during the campaigning period to secure vote. Further, such practice could lead to abuse or mismanagement of public fund that would be very unfair to the new government especially if there is a change in government. Also, the current government has been given ample time (around 5 years) to implement development and there is no necessity for last minute implementation.
2. Enact laws to strictly prohibit vote buying either directly or indirectly by the candidates or his/her agent or someone else. If proven guilty, the candidate is deemed to be disqualified, and entitled the other candidate with the second highest votes as winner without re-election.
3. Permit the Sarawakians who reside in Malaya to vote in Malaya. The current technology and infrastructure would facilitate this process without much a problem.
4. Introduce laws to prohibit the Pengulu and Tuai Rumah to be a political agent of any party. They are being paid by the government and as such should be treated like any government servants whereby they should abstain from being involved in politic.
If we could do the above, we would be able to see a more fair election in the Dayak areas in the future.
Welcome to “the best democracy in the world” (as claimed by jibbi)
http://malaysiansunited.blogspot.com/2009/01/malaysiakini-can-we-promise-bright.html
The truth is the electoral reform is NOT at the top of Sarawak problem. The elections while unfair would still be tolerable IF the existing laws was fairly reasonbly enforced. The problem of Sarawak is simply electoral lawlessness. The law don’t mean much when it comes to BN and Taib. If they just enforce the laws, unfair it may be, BN would go down..