Lim Kit Siang

Solutions and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are now reviving these kinds of systems. Coming from lie diagnosis tools tested at the line to a program for verifying documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being made use of in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series This Site of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their particular capacity to work these devices and to follow their right for cover.

It also illustrates how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering all of them from interacting with the stations of safeguards. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who all are disciplined by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: although they help to expedite the asylum procedure, they also help to make it difficult intended for refugees to navigate these systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions of non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.