Indonesia has to raise its voice to speak out for moderate Islam

– Rizvi Shihab
The Malaysian Insider
6 November 2014

One of the many challenges facing the current government is re-establishing Indonesia’s unique geographical, cultural and ideological identities.

Presently, there is a concerted governmental effort to augment Indonesia’s power by introducing its “maritime-axis” foreign policy to fully take advantage of its strategic geographical position.

But in addition to this maritime emphasis, I believe Indonesia needs to start disseminating its ideological character globally as a world ambassador of religious moderation. Members of the international community often wonder about the silence exhibited by the majority of moderate Muslim countries. This provides opportunity for Indonesia to step up and become the leader of this quiet group.

If the United States is known as the ethnic melting pot, Indonesia should strive to be acknowledged as the religious melting pot where members of all faiths live in tranquil harmony.

Recently, the former foreign minister of Tunisia, Mouldi Kefi commended Indonesia as the only country in the world that celebrates official religious holidays for Muslims, Christians, Buddhists and Hindus.

Indonesia is widely reputed as the largest Muslim-majority nation in the world, but it would carry higher meaning if it were also renowned as the centre of spiritual acceptance.

Threat of extremism

Interestingly, the recognition came from a Tunisian whose country is also attempting to institute a more accepting form of Islam.

According to a Pew Global Research study, concerns regarding religious extremism amongst Tunisians has sharply risen to 78% in 2014 from 52% in 2012. These trepidations have somewhat decided the recent elections in Tunisia where the secular Nidaa Tounes party was able to secure victory against the Ennahda party, which conceded its failings in monitoring and suppressing radicalism.

Similarly President Abdelfattah el-Sisi has been an active combatant against the religious extremism in Egypt, which was prevalent after the fall of Hosni Mubarak in 2011.

Since his election he has de-activated the Muslim Brotherhood’s political wing and labeled it as a terrorist organisation. Sisi’s stance on de-radicalisation remains a focal point of his administration and is supported by the majority of Egyptians, who feel his decisive actions have prevented Egypt from falling into the same trap experienced by Iraq and Syria.

During a United Nations speech on September 24, Sisi remarked that “the world has started to grasp the reality and understand why Egyptians revolted against extremism that wanted to break the unity of the nation.”

Peaceful coexistence

A similar problem is faced in Indonesia, where many feel the latest outbreaks of religious intolerance compromise the nation’s national philosophical foundation, Pancasila, which proclaims peaceful coexistence.

Domestically, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), the largest Muslim organisation in the world, has been the most active and vocal proponent of religious acceptance.

For example GP Ansor, NU’s youth wing, patrols churches on Christmas Eve to look out for any imminent terror threats.

This type of activity should not be questioned as it has been by some Indonesians, but must be promoted globally.

Last week Hasyim Muzadi, a senior NU member, along with the International Conference of Islamic Scholars, National Anti-Terrorism Agency and the Foreign Affairs Ministry, held a “Conflicts and Democratisation in the Middle East” seminar.

The intellectual gathering opened dialogues between leading religious figures, including Religious Affairs Minister Lukman Hakim Saifuddin and the diplomatic community.

It was attended by Indonesia’s current foreign affairs minister, Retno Marsudi, and her predecessors Hassan Wirajuda and Alwi Shihab. Ambassadors of Middle Eastern countries also attended the two-day seminar.

Active engagement

Considering the experience Egypt and Tunisia have in dealing with religious extremism, it would be advantageous if Indonesia’s foreign ministry formally collaborated with the North African nations to acquire more knowledge and techniques to contain extremism. By effectively tackling the issue of radicalism, Indonesia will then be able to fully realise its ideological character and go on to fill the absence of a significant moderate Islamic voice.

Member states of the European Union are also troubled by this disturbing matter. Germany, France and Britain have all been affected by religious extremism, creating an inaccurate and damaging image of Islam for many of the countries’ inhabitants.

The Italian ambassador to Indonesia, Federico Failla expressed his interest in arranging for renowned Indonesian Muslim scholars to visit Italy and present lectures and seminars to counteract some of the negative perceptions of Islam in that country. It is this negative perception that prompted Bill Maher, a well-known member of the Western media to label Islam as a “mafia religion”.

By re-establishing the quality of religious acceptance, Indonesia will benefit on several fronts, including through tourism, diplomacy and foreign investment.

Islam’s international standing will in a large part be decided by Indonesia, either by its apathy, or active engagement. Indonesia’s leaders must choose the latter option. – Jakarta Globe, November 6, 2014.

* Rizvi Shihab is a professional in the oil and gas sector and a researcher at the Bina Bangsa Foundation.

CategoriesUncategorized

6 Replies to “Indonesia has to raise its voice to speak out for moderate Islam”

  1. I am old enough to remember Sukarno and his fear of this problem and the audacity to start Pancasila. In contrast, at the time. Tunku, although he firmly stated Malaysia is a secular state, was convinced ultimately to add “Islam as the official religion” into the Constitution.

    Sukarno, because of the vast archipelago that is Indonesia, feared the power of the state would be ursuped by Islamist if it had no counter-altenative believing that even its Secular constitution was not enough.

    In the end, the very secular nature of Indonesia has stood strong because of history of Islam in Indoenesia was basic Sufism and fragementedly social. With the advent of more communication and media technology and spread of more organized Wahabhism and Salafist that is the root of the current extremism, it explains why Indonesia has had its own share of problems.

    With the advent of internet, globalization, trade and development and global social networks its not so easy now for what happened in the 80s, 90s, to go that far. What we see here today in Malaysia is a perfect example where online overwhelmingly does not favour the extremist BUT the cellphone and cheap air travel has been favourable to them.

    This ideological battle against them can win but its not with arms as the Western countries have done but with internet, social and innovative economic. The less place for them to hide, the easier it is to win this competition.

  2. Who or which country is funding this Wahabhism movement? That’s the root of this evil we are seeing. They can’t match the military power of the west but made up for it in religious extremism.

  3. Now, Indonesia has an elected LEADER that is working for the Nation and People.
    But here, the Bumnos’ Ah Cheat Kok, Warlords, etc are ” working ” for themselves.
    THAT’S THE MAJOR SIMPLE FUNDAMENTAL ISSUE FACING US NOW !!!!!!!!

  4. We do hv liberal Muslims
    A kolej drop out stored DNA of MORE than ONE person in his rectum
    D same kaki also “seduced” a female deputy public prosecutor
    Very liberal indeed, both male n female partners semua sapu

Leave a Reply