Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Nancy Shukri is right when she said today that the Cabinet could not make decisions on charges against Perkasa President Ibrahim Ali as this would be tantamount to meddling in the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney-General stipulated in the Constitution.
But Nancy is wrong when she implied that the Cabinet is impotent or must accept an Attorney-General who is guilty of selective or malicious prosecution, like the failure to prosecute Perkasa President Ibrahim Ali despite his threat to burn the Malay-language Bible or the “white terror” regime of sedition blitzkrieg since the beginning of this year to investigate or prosecute some 40 Pakatan Rakyat leaders, social activists, academicians and members of the press under the Sedition Act and other laws for the most legitimate and inoffensive expression of views.
While the Cabinet cannot interfere with the Attorney-General’s prosecutorial discretion under Article 145(3) of the Constitution, Cabinet Ministers, in particular the Prime Minister and the Minister vested with the powers of de facto Law Minister, cannot be indifferent to prevalent public opinion that the Attorney General was responsible for grave miscarriage of justice, whether in the failure to prosecute Ibrahim Ali for his threat to burn the Malay-language Bible threatening the very fabric of Malaysia’s multi-racial and multi-religious society or had violated the larger policy objective of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet to make Malaysia “the best democracy of the world” with the mass dragnet of sedition investigations and prosecutions.
Or is the Cabinet now claiming that the pledge to make Malaysia the world’s best democracy is the personal and individual promise of the Prime Minister, and that he had no mandate to make it on behalf of the Cabinet or Malaysian Government?
It may seem unfair that Nancy had been hounded for over two weeks for her parliamentary answer that Ibrahim Ali was not prosecuted for his threat to burn the Malay-language Bible, but this national outrage will not cease simply because right-thinking Malaysians cannot accept the two reasons which had been given for the Attorney-General’s decision not to prosecute – that Ibrahim was protecting the sanctity of Islam and Ibrahim’s action was protected by Article 11(4) of the Constitution.
Ibrahim Ali’s threat to burn the Malay-language Bible and his ability to get away scot-free enjoying immunity from any sanctions of the law will continue to dog Nancy wherever she goes in the country until the Najib government can give a satisfactory and acceptable accounting on the matter.
The Attorney-General and the Prime Minister should have come to her rescue, but they have chosen to keep quiet.
By the principle of Cabinet collective responsibility, the other Ministers should also have come to her assistance, but no Minister is prepared to stick his or her neck out over what is clearly a totally unacceptable and indefensible action.
Nancy said it is “unhealthy” to continue to harp on “negative issues” such as the non-prosecution of Ibrahim Ali for his threat to burn the Malay-language Bible.
For the overwhelming majority of Malaysians, what is really “unhealthy” is the refusal and inability of the Najib government to see the gross miscarriage of justice in allowing Ibrahim Ali to get away scot-free for his threat to burn the Malay-language Bible while the government is launching a blitzkrieg of sedition investigations and prosecutions against scores of Malaysians who have not made any hate and incendiary statements like Ibrahim’s threat to burn the Bible.
It just HUGELY SHOCKING that Nancy Shukry has no comprehension that her duty meant SHE HAS TO ACT AGAINST IBRAHIM ALI – whatever possible. Instead of doing her duty and job she is going round and round to make excuses for herself even correcting herself on the Cabinet roll – first saying they agreed with AG and then say they did not.
The MULTIPLE times she has insisted on no wrong rather than ACTING on the WRONG that is already there i.e., Ibrahim Ali shows the DETERMINATION TO BE IRRESPONSIBLE when needed by the people in difficult situation. The IRRESPONSIBILITY CHARACTER that is prevalent from Najib to everyone of her fellow BN politicians in Sarawak is what already CONDEMNS Sarawakian and Sabahan’s rights and the way of life as they know it..
Hey, she is very liberal minded n fair n principled
She said “I would have said the same answer if it was a threat to burn the Quran”
She also said: ‘Those who can’t talk good of M’sia don’t deserve to be M’sians’
Wow, a NEW definition of M’sians