Posted on by Kit

Designed to make us free

– Ang Jian Wei
The Malaysian Insider
Jan 04, 2012

JAN 4 — Upon returning from the New Year’s countdown, the last thing I expected to read was news of a clash between the police and the student body that decided to hold a sit-in outside Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI). The latter did so to champion academic freedom.

The result of that clash is a terrible way to start the year. The reaction of a just government should always be measured and proportional to the incident at hand — even if it’s done in the name of security. That did not seem to be the case in Tanjung Malim. It was way out of line and uncalled for.

It bordered on paranoia.

The numbers don’t add up. Why on earth do we need the police to demand the dispersal of a sit-in demonstration that we all know is temporary? These are students and their most lethal weapons are probably flashlights and an amplifier. I don’t think that will cause anybody to wet his/her pants.

They weren’t asking for a coup d’état. The authorities should have provided the students with a space where they could scream their lungs out and when it’s over, shake hands. They can then all go back to whatever it is they do to celebrate the dawn of a new year. And we can all read about the weather the next morning. Apparently that’s rocket science!

The truth is that it was not the students that the authorities (or whoever they represent) were so afraid of. It is the idea of academic freedom that somewhat scares them, I think.

The logic goes that if there aren’t regulations in place to control what the campuses can teach, publish or say, then the unfettered freedom would prevail and anarchy will soon descend. I’m sorry to burst the bubble, but there’s a problem with that. Absolute academic freedom is not possible, even if every restrictive law is rolled back.

The limit of academic freedom is one’s own stupidity. The academic arena is not a place for a dead sport. It’s a circus of opinions and only the strongest ideas survive. If anybody has the guts to throw a view out there, be my guest! But he/she has to prepare for the scrutiny of his/her peers that will soon ensue. If they think the idea is rubbish, they won’t hesitate to say so, albeit in a very refined or possibly boring manner — like you know… published journals.

Our universities are supposed to be fertile ground of “higher learning.” Have we ever asked what is it that is “higher” in our higher education? It is understanding that the world is not a homogenous place and that a prerequisite to an educated society is one that can suspend its own judgment to listen to differing views.

If we still don’t agree, then we can all retreat to our favourite mamak stalls and bitch about it without engaging in a fistfight. Should professors be allowed to superimpose their own views in their teaching? It would be academically imprudent, but why not? We do not attend universities to kiss their asses. We go there to engage, on their own turf if need be! That is the sort of graduates we should be producing.

I just want to end by saying that I took a class at my university pertaining to the Palestine-Israel Conflict. It was a class of 300 students. If there were an international quagmire that sends zealous passions off the roof, this would be it!

My professor confessed that at the beginning of the semester he had to meet the Dean to discuss options in the event that violence were to break out in the lecture halls. They considered stationing campus security details… just in case. But they didn’t do it. And it wasn’t a comfortable class. People argued — with passion. But you know what’s beautiful about that class?

When someone spoke, everybody listened. There wasn’t any violence either.

Free speech can at times hurt! But freedom of speech, in which academic freedom is a subset, is not meant to protect the things we like to hear. It’s there to ensure we hear the things we hate. And neither is it designed to make us comfortable.

It is designed to make us free.

* Ang Jian Wei’s thoughts are currently with those who were physically injured in Tanjung Malim. Though it’s a blemished start, he wishes everyone a Happy New Year. He blogs at lowfatketupat.com

CategoriesUncategorized

6 Replies to “Designed to make us free”

  1. Democracy is dead.
    Vote the gang of robbers and thieves out is the only solution.
    Many who returned from overseas can see and feel the difference….and know Najib is hoping for a Police State…no 13th GE.
    He can delay under his lawful rights..but if he exceeds the deadline…all hell with break loose.
    Lets see if he wants blood to flow or declare the 13th GE.

  2. The problem here is that the police protect the ruling regime, not the rakyat. The country needs to adopt democratic policing. One element in defining a democratic society is a police force that:

    1. is subject to the rule of law embodying values respectful of human dignity, rather than the wishes of a powerful leader or party
    2. can intervene in the life of citizens only under limited and carefully controlled circumstances and
    3. is publicly accountable.

    These conditions are inherent to police in a democracy.

  5. If there is any show of expression of feelings, one would think it might be some U like the rigid Malaya University. To have some unknown oop see taking the stage is like asking who is that or which U is that ? Or what is in it that can take down the world ? Higher learning means learning something that is more than what is already in existence and to change when there are opportunities to change. Are you saying tertiary education means you are great enough to change whatever you think you need to change ? If outright expression of feelings does not happen in the great Malaya University, why should it happen in some unknown oop see ? A form of advertisement ?

Leave a Reply