— Tan Teck Huat
The Malaysian Insider
Oct 02, 2011
OCT 2 — … Utusan Malaysia, The Star, News Sraits Times and other propaganda papers.
Today I made the colossal mistake of reading that MCA-owned ragsheet, The Star.
Under the pretence of caring about the future of Malaysia, they went on and on about hudud laws, trying to frighten Malaysians about PAS and Pakatan Rakyat.
But there was nothing in the paper about the theft of native land in Sarawak, about corruption in the country and abuse of power by Barisan Nasional politicians, including those from the MCA.
It is the same with Utusan Malaysia.
First they accused Lim Guan Eng of defaming Johor in an interview with a radio station in Australia.
When he showed them the transcript of the interview, they accused him of disparaging Johor during a talk in Singapore.
Lim apologised but Utusan and the slavish mainstream media never said sorry for going on a witch-hunt against him and getting it wrong about the interview in Australia.
And Utusan has the cheek to question the credibility of the DAP politician.
This, from a newsletter that has long forgotten the difference between facts and fiction.
The Star and NST are not too far behind.
The thing is this: These publications exist to further the interests of the political parties that own them.
They have no intention of making Malaysia a better country.
Their raison d’être is for their political masters to remain in power so that they can also milk the gravy train.
*************************
I find it amusing that there is a debate ensuing on whether MCA is relevant.
I think MCA, Gerakan and MIC are the equivalent of fixers or middlemen.
By themselves, they are powerless. But they make a living by leveraging on their connections to get things done.
So on his own, Dr Chua Soi Lek is just another Chinese politician.
He is sometimes useful when Nazri Aziz or Hishammuddin Hussein give him the time of day.
He and his party are not respected by Umno or the civil service.
If they disappear from the landscape, my life and yours will not be affected very much.
Truth be told, even in 2004, they did well in the polls only because there was such a strong feel good factor about Abdullah Badawi.
The only people who will be sad to see the back of MCA are the MCA office bearers and the people at The Star.