The Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz pressed most of the right buttons about public demands about electoral reforms when he announced without naming Bersih 2.0 that the parliamentary select committee on electoral reforms will base its framework on Bersih 2.0’s eight-point demands, viz:
1. Cleaning up the electoral roll
2. Reforming postal or advance voting
3. Use of indelible ink versus the EC’s proposal of a biometric system
4. Extending the campaign period to 21 days
5. Free and fair access to media
6. Strengthening the credibility of the EC
7. Ending vote-buying
8. Ending dirty politics
But on the most vital issue of a firm and unequivocal government commitment that the electoral reforms will be implemented before Parliament is dissolved to make way for the 13th general election, Nazri could offer no assurance except to say lamely: “That is not my problem…I don’t know when the election will be held.”
This has brought back to the fore the question about the relevance and usefulness of the parliamentary select committee, whether it is a genuine, sincere and serious government change of heart on electoral reforms or whether it is a mere political ploy to stonewall electoral reforms for the next general elections.
Without naming Bersih 2.0, Nazri said the Election Commission has been tasked with drawing up a framework for the parliamentary select committee based on the eight demands of Bersih 2.0 to be sent to the cabinet on Sept. 7.
This follows the meeting convened by Nazri with representatives from Parliament, the Attorney-General’s Chambers and the Election Commission.
It does not escape notice that the Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Election Commission attended the meeting in person and agreed to draft the framework for the parliamentary select committee based on the eight demands of Bersih 2.0 when in the past few months they had been in the forefront not only disagreeing but attacking the bona fides of both Bersih 2.0 and these eight demands.
What is the credibility that the parliamentary select committee is not a political ploy but represent a sincere, serious and genuine change of heart of the Barisan Nasional government on electoral reforms if Bersih 2.0 continues to be banned as an illegal and anti-national organization, its Chairperson Ambiga Sreenevasan defamed as “enemy of Islam” and its leaders and activists smeared as “front for foreign powers” out to create chaos, racial riot, violence backed by Christian Jewish and communists and other imaginary anti-national elements?
There are three steps the Cabinet can take at its meeting tomorrow to demonstrate that there is a sincere, serious and genuine change of heart on electoral reforms and that the parliamentary select committee is no political ploy, viz:
• revoke the ban on Bersih 2.0 and drop all charges against the 1,600 Malaysians arrested for taking part in the peaceful Bersih 2.0 rally for free and fair elections on July 9 and all others related to Bersih 2.0 rally, including those for wearing Bersih T-shirts or just wearing yellow;
• fully consult with and secure the agreement of the Pakatan Rakyat parties on the issue of parliamentary select committee – it terms of reference, membership, time-line and other parameters; and
• the Election Commission and the BN Government to announce what are the Bersih 2.0’s eight demands on electoral reforms which could and could not be immediately implemented even before Parliament meets on Oct. 3.
As time is of the essence considering the imminence of the next general election, it is of vital and paramount importance that the Election Commission and BN Government should clarify what are the Eight Demands of the Bersih 2.0 which could and could not be immediately implemented even before Parliament meets on Oct. 3.
The verdict had been written even before the trial started. The judge’s duty is just to write the grounds to dovetail into that pre-trial verdict… and then wait to collect his dues and his promotion.
The most important item is the counting of votes on the night and should any discrepancies arise then no candidate should be announced the winners.
The checking must be done by professionals engaged for such purpose.
This Law Minister thinks he is a smart tongue twister.
We all know who he is.
Sick of this low class one sided UMNO B Law Minister whose job is to interpret laws to protect his party ..Najib and Mahathir.
///The Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz pressed most of the right buttons about public demands about electoral reforms when he announced without naming Bersih 2.0 that the parliamentary select committee on electoral reforms will base its framework on Bersih 2.0’s eight-point demands///
Doesn’t the fact that Bersih remains banned imply that the Parliamentary Polls Reform Panel/Select Committee is actually adopting, as its framework, the demands/proposals of an illegal/unlawful organisation ??? How is an organisation adjudged unlawful? If an organisation is normally adjudged unlawful by its objectives (eg alleged as against national security etc) how could Parliamentary Select Committee use them as its framework for recommendation to Parliement? Only in BolehLand such a conundrum exists! Maybe Minister in charge of Parliament who is also a lawyer by training can explain this conundrum.
Beware of BN’s delay tactic to buy time!
Hey, I dont get it. So umno said bersih is illegal. Right? Maybe wrong. Huh? Because umno wanted to incorporate bersih’s (wot?) 8-point demands into psc’s scope. Whooa, what is going on jib? Let me do an umno here. I would say that errr that means umno is legalising bersih. Hows dat, huh? Better? Clearer?
Celaka punya umno.
Anyway. Of course we all know umno well. Let me tell you this. Umno would surely incorporate the whole (or nearly the whole) of bersih’s demand in the scope of psc’s study.
It is only a study, people. Get it? But the outcome of the study and all proposals for law reform flowing from that study would be a different story altogether.
Tu dia, umno for you.
Are you asking swindlers to cooperate with you, and to give you an inch? Those are not only swindlers; they are also bunch of suckers! They wanted desperately suck you more…
Dreaming, Malaysian! Leopards never ever change their spotty bodies!
It is the height of ridiculous leadership that Najib announce something at important as this and have not actually thought through the specifics, the datelines, the plans..Seriously, what are we looking at here? – the Make Excuses administration?
When confronted with tough decision, instead of figuring out how to fix it, make a real plan, they seem to think so long as they can give excuses, then they can go ahead with it and announce it.
Seriously, he sounds like Indian IT people who keep giving one excuses after another why systems are not working. I fire those people and get someone who is willing to take charge and lead. UMNO/BN leaders are like call-centers in some boondocks in India not even the better ones from Bangalore..