KL better off without ‘padded rolls, vote buying’, says Singapore ST
By Debra Chong
The Malaysian Insider
Jul 12, 2011
KUALA LUMPUR, July 12 — Malaysia’s top leadership would be better off working to deliver its promised reforms and give substance to the 1 Malaysia vision than stoop to a partisan approach in dealing with dissent, the Singapore Straits Times said today.
The influential daily also remarked in its editorial today that last Saturday’s Bersih 2.0 rally here has thrown the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition on the backfoot even though it managed to deliver a counter-punch to the civil society movement.
The Singapore paper is privately-owned but is often seen to reflect the republic’s establishment voice, which appears keen to keep its current good ties with Putrajaya while protecting the republic’s interest.
In the piece titled “A very Malaysian impediment”, the paper remarked that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has gained widespread support as a “moderate leader” through his liberalisation of some race-based practices to a certain extent while being mindful of keeping its majority Malay sensibilities.
“But it would be better for the country if it could move more rapidly to give substance to Mr Najib’s vision of ‘1 Malaysia’ — an inclusive political culture in which all races can be comfortable with one another,” it said.
The paper further remarked that Malaysian debate is now framed in an even more polarised racial context of “us-against-them contest” — where the Malays fear an erosion of their privileges and political primacy while the non-Malays demand fairness.
“It should be acknowledged for what it was: a cry for equity and a demand that the nation’s resources and talent be not sacrificed on irresolute policies,” it said.
“One consequence of this was Barisan Nasional being forced on the backfoot, even though Umno Youth delivered a counter-punch,” it added, noting that Bersih activists were likely to face charges in court over the affair.
The paper advised the Najib administration not to stop at invoking the law over the rally, which it described as a “common disturbance” but to look beyond the incident and move to resolve the issues raised by the civil society movement it noted was key for national unity.
“Bersih’s agenda was electoral reform,” ST said.
“If padded rolls, vote buying and multiple voting are true as alleged, Malaysia would surely be better off without these impediments,” it said, noting that the rally was duplicated in many other cities around the world by Malaysians abroad.
The world is laughing and the crux of the matter is the infamous cousins botched (or in more layman’s term “screwed up”) badly both nationally and internationally. Wonder how Jibby’s reception is going to be like when he arrives in London eh?
///The paper further remarked that Malaysian debate is now framed in an even more polarised racial context of “us-against-them contest” — where the Malays fear an erosion of their privileges and political primacy while the non-Malays demand fairness.///–NST
Bersih procession sees more Malays than other races. Malays, those who are better educated after 54 years of independence realize that the so-called stigma of special-position that they bore are being taken advantage of by Calicut-type of Kakak Malays, and mamaks. They know that because of the unequal position of different races, they lose more in average than they would have gained had the country been run race-blind, with assistance by government based on compassion rather than racial superiority. The Malays realize now that they gain neither pride nor pleasure to see some so-called Malays become tycoon. It has become clear to them their tycoon-ship were built on their sufferings of high cost of living and low income.
Singapore dua kali lima lah! Try demonstrating in Singapore.
Anyway that does not make our local fellows right when the let the police loose (unleashed) the police on peaceful demonstrators.
“when they let the police loose”