When the Dzaiddin Royal Police Commission submitted its final report in May 2005, it said that Malaysia’s reputation as a safe country was “seriously dented” by the “dramatic increase” in the incidence of crime in the past few years and that “Malaysians in general, the business sector and foreign investors grew increasingly concerned with the situation”.
The Royal Commission warned that “if the trend continues, there would be major social and economic consequences for Malaysia”.
The Royal Police Commission was referring to the “dramatic increase” in the crime index from 121,176 cases in 1997 to 156,455 cases in 2004, which registered an increase of 29 per cent in eight years.
As a result, the Royal Police Commission proposed a sustained nation-wide drive against crime “until crime levels have reached a point considered no longer alarming”, with an immediate target of “a minimum 20 per cent decrease in crimes” in all categories of crime within the first 12 months after the Report.
Instead of achieving the Police Royal Commission’s target of reducing the intolerably high incidence of crime of 156,455 cases in 2004 by 20 per cent in 12 months (i.e. 125,164 cases), the reverse took place.
In the seven years from 1997 to 2004, crime index increased by 29%, but in the four years from 2004 to 2008 crime index increased by 35.5% – breaking the 200,000 mark since 2007.
Recently, both the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak and Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein had made great play about the successful NKRA on crime reduction, claiming that there have been a drastic drop in the crime rate particularly in street crime with improvement of the crime index since January this year.
However, up and down the country, ordinary Malaysians do not feel this dividend of fall of crime index in their daily lives as they do not feel comparatively safer in the streets, public places or privacy of their homes as compared to previous years.
In fact, the continued mushrooming of gated and guarded communities in the country is most eloquent proof of the failure of the police force in the country to discharge its most basic duty, to ensure that Malaysians, visitors, tourists and investors enjoy the two fundamental rights to be free from crime and the fear of crime.
In its 2005 Report, the Dzaiddin Royal Police Commission made 125 recommendations to create an efficient, incorruptible, professional world-class police service focused on three core functions – to keep crime low, to eradicate corruption and to uphold human rights.
Five years have passed. Have we progressed or regressed in the overall objective of the Dzaiddin Royal Police Commission Report to create an efficient, incorruptible, professional world-class police service capable of performing the three core functions to keep crime low, eradicate corruption and uphold human rights?
In my view, the police report card based on the Dzaiddin Royal Police Commission Report is in red ink as there is regression instead of progress in all the three police core functions to keep crime low, eradicate corruption and uphold human rights.
But this is not only the view of Malaysians outside the police force but also that of independent, dispassionate and objective former officers of the police force.
In this regard, I refer to the Open Letter by a former top cop, former Kuala Lumpur CID chief Mat Zain Ismail, published at Raja Petra Kamaruddin’s portal, Malaysia-Today, two days ago on 12th October 2010 which is powerful testimony that the criminal justice system had worsened after the 2005 Dzaiddin Police Royal Commission Report.
Mat Zain was the police officer who headed the initial investigation into the 1998 case of Anwar Ibrahim’s “black eye” assault while in police custody in Bukit Aman and recommended that the then Inspector-General of Police, Tan Sri Rahim Noor be prosecuted for criminal assault against Anwar, but his recommendation was ignored until a Royal Commission of Inquiry was subsequently set up resulting Rahim being found guilty and sentenced to two months’ jail.
Mat Zain recounted in his Open Letter when referring to the investigation into Anwar “black-eye” assault case in 1998, that he had to decide at the time whether to salvage the honour of PDRM or that of Rahim Noor and he decided with sadness to propose that Rahim Noor, whom he had the highest respect as a leader, a colleague and family friend, be prosecuted under Section 323 of the Penal Code.
Mat Zain wrote the Open Letter to Datin Kalsom Taib, wife and biographer of Datuk Shafee Yahaya, former head of the Anti-Corruption Agency, in response to questions asked in her book about police investigations into allegations against former Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad for abuse of power in June 1998 in ordering a halt to corruption investigations against Ali Abul Hassan Sulaiman, head of Economic Planning Unit. Mat Zain was the officer in charge of investigations into the allegations.
Mat Zain was also the officer responsible for the investigations into the four police reports lodged by Anwar from 9th July 1999 to 20th August 1999 when in Sungai Buloh prison on abuses of power and obstruction of the process of justice directed against Mahathir, the then Attorney-General the late Tan Sri Mohtar Abdullah, current Attorney-General Tan Sri Gani Patail as well as reports of corruption and abuses of power against Tun Daim Zainuddin, Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz, Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Thamby Cik and the late Tan Sri Eric Chia.
Mat Zain revealed in his Open Letter that he had written in May this year to Tan Sri Ismail Omar, then Deputy IGP and to the Home Minister, Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein, for a review of the investigations into the false evidence produced against Anwar in the “black eye” assault case of 1998 “to protect the credibility, impartiality and image of the of PDRM which had been seriously affected since 2006”.
Mat Zain made the very serious allegation that former IGP Musa Hassan and Attorney-General Gani Patail had allowed fabricated evidence in the Anwar Ibrahim “black eye” assault case and must be held responsible for the current mess of the criminal justice system.
Mat Zain asked in the Open Letter:
“Apa sudah jadi dengan Sistem Keadilan Jenayah kita?….Siapa yang sepatutnya dipersalahkan? Siapa yang menyebabkan Sistem Keadilan Jenayah kita menjadi kucar kacir sehinggakan sesiapa juga boleh mempermain-mainkannya tanpa takut kepada sebarang tindakan dan hukuman undang-undang? Saya tidak teragak-agak untuk menyatakan bahawa keadaan ini berpunca daripada ‘precedent’ yang dibuat oleh Tan Sri Gani Patail dan Tan Sri Musa Hassan sendiri.”
Can Gani Patail, Musa Hassan or even the Home Minister Hishammuddin and IGP Ismail keep mum on this most incriminating and devastating Open Letter by a former top cop?
[Speech (Pt 2) at the Suaram forum “IGP Bertukar: Institusi Polis Berubah?” held at KL/Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall on Thursday, 14th October 2010 at 8 pm]
Even with officer in the mold of Mat Zain in the police force, PDRM is in this pitiable state. It shows that the wrong persons have always been picked to be in position that matters. So, the fish rot in the head first, and in the case of PRDM, the PM picked the fish. It might be the intension at picking the wrong fish so that it is worth his trouble climbing up to the PM position. That started with the retirement of Tun Hanif.
Are we surprised? What he wrote was no more than a confirmation of our strongly felt sentiments. Umno is beyond hope. Anyone else would and in fact could do a better job.
Get rid of umno in GE13 fellas. And do so decisively.
Its not only Mat Zain’s letter but all revelations in Malaysia Today.
The silence from the government, IGP, AG and MACC is deafening.
It is so obvious n logical dat as long as UmnoB/BN r in power, no honest n just person can b allowed 2 head any gomen agency, judiciary, n executive
D current n ex leaders of UmnoB/BN r very scared dat an honest/just guy will prosecute them n hang them high 4 all d evil n corrupt deeds dat they did
Dis is d reason Y racist MMK kept pushing 4 racist Malays 2 remain in Putrajaya
YB Kit, trust me, nothing will happen. All these who walk in the corridors of power have so much skeletons in the closet that they have no choice but to cover up for each other or else the whole structure will collapse like a house of cards – and they know it.
The IPCMC is history. How could it ever see the light of day if its implementation will uncover all these shenanigans? It is in the interest of the Executive , the Judiciary, PDRM, MACC, AG’s chambers to all work in concert to protect each other.
I am quite doubtful about the veracity of the Government’s crime index. Another index that many people cast doubt on is the Consumer Price Index. We are fortunate to have a conscientious person like Mat Zain Ismail but unfortunately people like Mat Zain are now an extreme rarity. Are we really trying to eradicate corruption or are we actually encouraging it? Sin Chew Daily reported today that over the last couple of years, six high ranking Government officials (including an ex-minister) have been charged with corrupt practices but eventually none was convicted. Are the MACC really that inept in gathering corroborating evidence or are they just not serious about the responsibility entrusted upon them?