Open Letter to PAC Chairman Azmi Khalid that he should avoid conflict-of-interest as former Cabinet Minister in 2007 and disqualify himself from conducting the PAC inquiry into the RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal

YB Datuk Seri Azmi Khalid,
Chairman,
Public Accounts Committee,
Chairman
11th August 2009

YB Datuk Seri,

I take the liberty through this Open Letter to ask you to avoid conflict-of-interest as former Cabinet Minister in 2007 to disqualify yourself from conducting the Public Accounts Committee inquiry into the RM12.5 billion Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) scandal.

I had earlier written to you in a letter dated 17th June 2009 asking you to step down as Chairman of the PAC inquiry into the PKFZ scandal as you were a Cabinet Minister from 2004 to 2008, a period when the previous Cabinet had made various decisions concerning PKFZ, including giving retrospective approval for the four Letters of Support unlawfully issued by the two previous Transport Ministers, Tun Dr. Ling Liong Sik and Tan Sri Chan Kong Choy to guarantee the RM4 billion bonds issued by the PKFZ turnkey developer, Kuala Dimensi Sdn. Bhd (KDSB) as well as the RM4.6 billion Cabinet decision to bail out PKFZ.

You raised my letter at the PAC meeting the same day on 17th June 2009 and as you subsequently disclosed publicly, the majority of the PAC were satisfied with your assurance that you had no personal involvement in the PKFZ when you were Minister from 2004 to 2008 and that there was no need to disqualify yourself in the PAC inquiry into PKFZ.

I am raising this matter a second time as the issue of conflict-of-interest not personally, but as a Minister in the previous government when it took the decision to approve the RM4.6 billion bailout of PKFZ, could no longer avoided.

PAC has summoned the Attorney-General Tan Sri Gani Patail to appear before its PKFZ inquiry tomorrow to give his opinion on the legality or otherwise of the four Letters of Support which had plunged the country into the RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal.

Wouldn’t the PAC inquiry tomorrow take on the character of a farce and charade with you sitting as PAC Chairman asking for the legal opinion of the AG, when in 2007 you had sat in the Cabinet and received and accepted the very same legal opinion of the Attorney-General that the four Letters of Support were implicit government guarantees for the RM4 billion bonds raised by KDSB in the bond market for PKFZ project – and that they were illegally issued by Ling and Chan and which was why the Cabinet had to give retrospective approval for the Four Letters of Support?

You should in fact vacate from the chair of PAC Chairman in the PKFZ inquiry to testify why you and other Cabinet Ministers agreed with the Attorney-General’s opinion in 2007 that the four Letters of Support were implicit government guarantees for which the Cabinet had to give retrospective approval.

Although late to step down as Chairman of the PAC inquiry, it is still the proper thing for you to do as it is never too late to do what is right, i.e. to stand down and disqualify yourself from chairing the rest of the PAC inquiry into the PKFZ scandal.

That this is a course that you should take has been strengthened by the latest developments of the PKFZ scandal – the final admissions of up to RM1 billion financial irregularities in a report of the PKFZ special task force, described as “tip of the icebert,” and the police reports lodged by the Port Klang Authority (PKA) Chairman Datuk Lee Hwa Beng against KDSB and BTA Architect over the financial irregularities.

This has proved you were completely wrong when a fortnight ago you blamed the PKFZ scandal on “a group of incompetent people” from day one – as it was not just incompetence but the lack of integrity, from the highest Ministerial level downwards, which must be held responsible for the PKFZ “mother of all scandals”.

The PAC inquiry into the PKFZ scandal must probe into the various degrees of Ministerial responsibility by the different Cabinet Ministers in the previous government (which includes you) in accordance with the principle of collective Ministerial responsibility.

The decision to disqualify yourself from the PAC inquiry into the PKFZ scandal is one which you have to take on your own conscience as it cannot to passed to the majority of the PAC members comprising Barisan Nasional MPs.

Yours sincerely,
Lim Kit Siang
Ahli Parlimen Ipoh Timor

7 Replies to “Open Letter to PAC Chairman Azmi Khalid that he should avoid conflict-of-interest as former Cabinet Minister in 2007 and disqualify himself from conducting the PAC inquiry into the RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal”

  1. what ever outcome it may be from PAC. It was for show and it will not carry any weight.

    Tomorrow AG? All can forget about it. You and me can know the answer now.

    Anyway, it seem OTK and LHB are moving on some right track on lodging a polis report but it all depend what next as polis also have to get green light too. you know ?

  2. YB Kit,

    Let him continue. You will be doing him a favour if you point out to him the error of his ways. By continuing, he will be doing all of us a favour because he will only succeed in making a bigger fool of the BN as he waddles through the charade. He has his head buried in the sand and remains oblivious to the public perception that any findings he makes will be viewed with a big pinch of salt – not to mention that other independent parties has already discovered damning evidence of wrongdoing, which renders his findings superflous and meaningless.

  3. “Open Letter to PAC Chairman Azmi Khalid that he should avoid conflict-of-interest as former Cabinet Minister in 2007 and disqualify himself from conducting the PAC inquiry into the RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal”

    His appointment was designed to engineer the outcome of the inquiry. I must not forget that he was chosen because of his loyalty to UMNO.

  4. Also check whether the provisions of the Banking and Financial Institutions Act (BAFIA) have been breached with respect to the 4 Letters of Support / Guarantees given by the Ministers with regards to the issuance of the bonds which attracted investments from financial institutions and other investors. Perhaps Bank Negara and the Securities Commission should also be involved to see whether there have been breaches to their respective laws.

  5. Sheriff BAFIA does not regulate ministry la I believe. Letters of comfort very often can become guarantees, that is what the AG has said.

    Better still, now Kuala Dimensi wants to pull as many down as possible. RM10M for MCA laaa … time to bring out the popcorn!!!

Leave a Reply