The Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak has not turned a stone in the past 13 days although he promised the Teoh Beng Hock family yesterday that “no stone will be left unturned” to find the causes and circumstances of Teoh’s mysterious death at the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) headquarters in Shah Alam on July 16, 2009.
I met the Teoh Beng Hock family members, father Teoh Leong Hwee 62, elder brother Teoh Beng Kee, younger sister Teoh Lee Lan and fiancée Soh Cher Wei at the Shah Alam court complex for Teoh’s inquest this morning, and they told me that the Prime Minister conveyed his condolences and explained the Cabinet decision to set up two separate inquiries, one an inquest by a magistrate into Teoh’s death and the other a Royal Commission of Inquiry into MACC’s investigative techniques.
In the press today, it was reported that Najib told the family that the findings of the inquest would also be considered as input for the royal commission of inquiry and that the two-prong approach would hopefully arrive at the truth in a fair and just manner.
This is putting the cart before the horse, as the international best practice in developed Commonwealth countries dealing with unusual or mysterious deaths which have become subjects of public concern and even international attention is for high-powered and wide-ranging public inquiries to be held and for its findings to be considered as input for inquests , and not the other way round.
A case in point is the Hutton inquiry into Dr. David Kelly’s mysterious death in the United Kingdom in 2003.
Kelly, a Ministry of Defence scientist, was found dead after appearing before a parliamentary committee investigating the political scandal of the UK war against Iraq as he was accused of leaking sensitive information to the British Broadcasting Corporation.
A judicial inquiry headed by a judge, Justice Hutton was established to inquire into the causes and circumstances of Kelly’s death.
The inquest into Kelly’s death by the Oxfordshire Coroner was adjourned while the inquiry proceeded. The inquiry reported on 28th January 2004 and the Oxfordshire Coroner announced in March 2004 that the inquest would not be reconvened.
Clearly, the Prime Minister who is not a lawyer has been misled by the Attorney-General, Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail, who does not seem to know about international best practices in such cases in other Commonwealth countries.
What about the other Cabinet Ministers who are trained in law – could they be so easily misled on a legal matter by the Attorney-General?
The Teoh family told me at the inquest this morning that they thanked the Prime Minister and appreciate his meeting them at Putrajaya yesterday, and Najib’s reply to the family that if it is not satisfied with the findings of the inquest, he was prepared to consider the family’s request at that time to establish a full and comprehensive Royal Commission of Inquiry.
The Teoh family told me that after full consideration of the explanations by the Prime Minister and taking account the reasons which had been extensively canvassed in the public domain on the respective pros and cons of an inquest and a Royal Commission of Inquiry, the Teoh family maintained their call on the Prime Minister to set up a Royal Commission of Inquiry into the causes and circumstances of Teoh’s death.
I fully agree with the Teoh family. Najib and the Cabinet should abandon “the government knows best” culture and listen to the voices not only of the family but all right-thinking Malaysians who want justice and the truth in a full no-holds-barred inquiry into the causes and circumstances of Teoh’s mysterious death at MACC headquarters.
For this reason, Najib and the Cabinet should review its decision last Wednesday, suspend the inquest proceedings and immediately establish a full Royal Commission of Inquiry headed by an eminent and credible Chairman to inquire into the causes and circumstances of Teoh’s death.
Najib assured the Teoh family that “No stone will be left unturned” in finding out the causes and circumstances of Teoh’s death at the MACC headquarters. Up to now, Najib has not turned a single stone as in the ordinary circumstances, an inquest would have been held into a mysterious death as required by law even without Cabinet decision. The Cabinet has done nothing which the law had not provided for the normal course of events.
Let Najib “turn the first stone” to find out the causes and circumstances of Teoh’s death by setting up a Royal Commission of Inquiry latest at the next Cabinet meeting on Wednesday, August 5,2009. Are MCA Ministers led by Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat, Gerakan President Tan Sri Koh Tsu Koon, MIC, SUPP and right-thinking Umno Ministers prepared to stand up and be counted on this issue?
PR its called PR … the stone is slowly turning. That is how it works. At their own pace and convenience. Also, they need time to sort out the ending, it does take a bit of time to make it look as credible as possible.
Why criminal lawyer was appointed instead of a DPP for the inquest??? why spent unnecessary money in appointing a criminal lawyer rather than using the service of DPP who is drawing monthly salary from the govt that taxed from the Rakyat??? No wonder the govt is taxing every way to foot the bills for engaging contractors in the name of outsourcing but at the same time keeping million of govt servants and doing nothing!!! Now the UMNO-BN govt want to use Rela to solve the high crime rate!!! Another way to spend millions in the name of fighting crime!!!
Is there no competent DPP around in the AG office???
Why appoint criminal lawyer Tan Hock Chuan and not other lawyer??? MACC should investigate how AG office appoint THC and not others and how the process of selecting him came about!!!
Najib assured the Teoh family that “No stone will be left unturned’’
What he did was creating a roadblock (inquest by a magistrate) to a full and comprehensive RCI.
I don’t understand if you have 79 witnesses including the official ones such as the pathologist and Police officers the hearing can be completed in two weeks?
Since there are different groups of lawyers, many witnesses would be questioned by these lawyers hence time consuming and the keen interest now would wane.
Any estimate that how long would the hearing take if the inquest proceed ?
Should the inquested be abandoned mid way somehow, the same group of witnesses would be called again.
They are selective in which stone to turn – example is pointless to have RCI over procedure of macc interrogation matters.Most of the rakyat want nothing else but RCI on the death of TBH.This is the stone e want you to turn!
How to trust politicians who just talk, talk and talk only. Promises no stone left unturned.Till todate the rakyat have yet to see any stone turn at all.
As a matter of fact, the rakyat are stone in believing that the government is insincere and unfair. Somehow, some thing is not right in pursuing Teoh’s death/murder.
PKR must get to the bottom and exposed those involved.
Let me guess. The stones have been washed clean and placed under a coconut shell.
Under the stone got nothing …
Stones can get turned but the big rock cannot be moved lah!
I’m guessing that Teoh died while being questioned and the MACC is responsible for trying to cover-up a death in custody.
http://malaysiawatch4.blogspot.com/2009/07/malaysiakini-and-case-of-teoh-beng-hock.html